​The Wikipedia Handbook of Model (MoS) offers comprehensive recommendations for writing and arrangement television-related articles. These criteria assure reliability, quality, and neutrality across Wikipedia's huge content. While the MoS addresses a wide selection of subjects, a few important elements are particularly highly relevant to television 티비위키 .​

en.wiki2.org

All material should be prepared from a neutral place of view. What this means is preventing subjective language and ensuring that all information is verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. Phrases like "legendary," "famous," or "groundbreaking" should be used moderately and only once reinforced by credible sources. ​

en.wiki2.org

The MoS advises applying today's tense when discussing the show's variety, assumption, and characters, even though the show has concluded. For instance, "The display follows a group of friends living in New York City." Previous tight is acceptable when discussing specific functions or episodes.​

Weasel words, or vague phrases that lack clear indicating, should really be avoided. Phrases like "some state," "several think," or "it has been suggested" can undermine the article's credibility. Instead, feature information to unique resources to steadfastly keep up verifiability. ​

Consistency in formatting is crucial. Use phrase case for headings and games, and ensure that provides, tables, and infoboxes are formatted based on MoS guidelines. For example, occurrence brands should be italicized, and season numbers should really be written in Arabic numerals.​

All statements should be reinforced by trusted, third-party sources. Use inline citations to feature information to particular options, and make certain that the research number is prepared appropriately in accordance with MoS standards. Avoid original study and assure that most data is verifiable.​

wikipedia-org.zproxy.org

Posts shouldn't serve as promotional material. Avoid language that would be perceived as advertising, such as "the very best display ever" or "severely acclaimed without evidence." Alternatively, present data objectively and help claims with verifiable sources.​Wikipedia is just a collaborative software, and consensus is key. If disagreements arise about content or formatting, discuss them on the article's talk page. Regard the thoughts of other writers and come together to enhance the article.​